It's a bitch when someone holds you accountable for what you write in a public forum. That's all I'm doing.
First he says this....>>and have worked closely with this Company (Directors, officers, management, SoftQuad IPO Underwriters, Analysts, et al) since Spring 1996 <<
Two posts later he says they wouldn't listen to him, save recent concerns. Which one do you believe? I think the second is likely accurate. That is probably why he mounted this smear campaign against the company. Maybe it's a case of bruised ego, who knows. The only certainty is that the more he posts, the wilder the allegations become. Yes, I am a critic of his conduct on this thread.
The company is unaware of any problems with the distribution. It was handled by NKC's transfer agent, Montreal Trust. For future reference, the company's filings are available electronically at SEDAR, where you will find timely postings of the notice of annual meeting and the proxy forms. sedar.com A complaint to your mail service may be more appropriate, but please let me know how it goes with the SEC.
I am holding my position in the stock. The low cash position has added some risk to the investment, but I feel the list of titles is good enough to allow a more favorable financing in the future.
best to you, tj. |