SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO)
CSCO 78.53+2.0%2:16 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: bambs who wrote (36662)5/26/2000 7:26:00 PM
From: Midnightsun  Read Replies (2) of 77400
 
bambi,

I guess I fit into the category of "jack asses" since I am long in Cisco and have been for a very long period. Long enough that my base price is less than 6 bucks. Not bad for a jack ass especially since I own a ton of the stock that "is going to fall" as you put it. I have been reading this thread and many others for quite a while but I have never posted because I don't have much to contribute since I just invest long and sit back and wait. After reading your latest post I felt that I should jump in on the "longs" side. If you make a $1000 bucks a day then more power to you. That is well over $300,000 a year and thats a lot of bucks. Of course my holding long more than triples that but I am in the jack ass group so I can't do any better. I have found that it is always the shorters and daytraders that love to brag about their good fortune when stocks take a nosedive and grow rather quiet when stocks rise. This is probably due to the inner wishing that a stock needs to fall right away in order to make some money. Reading your posts, you fit in that category. Name calling is uncalled for and wishing others bad luck and misfortune when we are all just trying to make a buck underlines the type of individual you seem to be. I really think you are probably a nice guy outside of investing so why not act like one...........
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext