SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : LAST MILE TECHNOLOGIES - Let's Discuss Them Here
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: lml who wrote (7109)5/27/2000 7:52:00 AM
From: MikeM54321  Read Replies (1) of 12823
 
lml and Frank- I did read lml's post when he first placed it on the thread. But I don't understand how the deal is structured. Maybe the devil will be in the details?

Sounds like it's a very similar situation to the CO co-location problems between data-CLECs and the incumbent. The only difference is that the incumbent now doesn't own the RT(mini-CO). So doesn't this make it a worse situation for SBC, or any incumbent, in the same situation?

Seems like to me, SBC would have been better not to even attempt to shut out the data-CLECs using 99-238 and just have said, "Let's do our typical games in the RT as we have played in the CO."

So my question is, how does the ASI solution, apparently proposed by the FCC, promote xDSL rollouts? I don't understand. -MikeM(From Florida)
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News