I never said that I was right 110% of the time. Probably about 80%. It also takes a whole bunch of attention to allocation of capital, risk management etc. etc. We pay attention to about 10 times as many factors than you stated in your post, bottom line though, AP and the site have a good "gut" feeling for hype and BS. And yes, all of the posts that I have seen are accurate, at least as accurate as they can be during frantic trading (within a few percent). I mean you see them posted and you see the trading at that time. I have to say that is a silly question. We are very good at looking at the core of the company and the news releases very fast. Hey, it aint easy, it takes a lot of time and learning to master this stuf.
I dont even understand your question about leaking supposed press releases, we play squarely. If we come across tangible evidence that supports our views then of course we will display it. What you and the others seem to be in denial about, is our intangible evidence, our opinions and gut feelings that XYZ is a hype job. Even if it tanks you deny it.
We have been doing this for a while now, and other than our negative opinions on some companies and verbal wars of words that we may get into with some posters, where do you get the idea that we need to lie and post false press releases? Sorry, all you have here is a group of people who are good at what they do and who dont share the same rosy picture as you concerning some of these price valuations.
Also, I see no need to debate, i mean we are pretty successful and you see us posting our opinions all over, so what is there to debate? |
