SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly?
MSFT 492.01+1.3%Nov 28 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: JC Jaros who wrote (45734)5/31/2000 7:31:00 PM
From: rudedog  Read Replies (2) of 74651
 
re: Do you doubt that?

Yes, I doubt that, for 2 reasons.

First, I think the OEMs were more afraid of DOJ retaliation - people are a lot more sensitive to the government digging in their stuff than any possible retaliation from MSFT. In that context, the "fear of Microsoft" would have been a good excuse, when the real reason is that the OEMs or whoever just didn't want to get involved or tie up any executive time in a witch hunt, but didn't want the DOJ on their backs either.

Second, there is nothing that a big company could do to keep individual executives from testifying. This is a DOJ investigation, for god's sake, they can subpoena anyone they want and grill them for hours, and they did so. If there was any thread they had picked up, they would have been all over it.

So I think that was pure PR from the DOJ with no basis in fact.

While I don't necessarily trust the MSFT testimony - it was "the gang who couldn't shoot straight", These guys are obviously techies not politicians or lawyers - I trust the government even less. My distrust of politicians runs deep and is based on lots of personal experience. From the local councilman saying "that's a fine handsome boy you have there Mrs. Cavindash" to Slick Willy saying "I did not have sex with that woman", my first assumption about anything a government employee says is that it's probably not true.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext