SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Charles R who wrote (113668)6/1/2000 11:17:00 AM
From: minnow68  Read Replies (1) of 1573433
 
Chuck,

You wrote "So, in the times when you are capacity constrained, you are making an argument for letting chips sit on the shelf because the marketing group made the mistake of introducing a $2000 ASP part into a consumer segment that typically wants to pay $600 for the whole system and where systems over $2000 have become rare?"

Yes, I would rather have some chips sit on the shelf. There is feedback. If AMD introduces a 1.5 Ghz T-bird at $5,000, AMD will see what the demand is. AMD can always remark the parts and sell them at lower speed grades. IOW, parts never have to sit on the shelf more than a few weeks. But, if 1.5 Ghz T-birds are production quality and ready, then why not put them up for sale at $5,000?

Even a sell rate of 1000 a week would bring in an incredible amount of money.

Mike
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext