SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Nokia (NOK)
NOK 6.960+0.7%12:26 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Eric L who wrote (5188)6/1/2000 2:26:00 PM
From: tero kuittinen  Read Replies (2) of 34857
 
It's possible to interprete a decision to favor 1900 MHz band as anti-Finnish, since it creates an artificial barrier to importing cutting edge GSM products. Rather than being "neutral", it actually places a burden on GSM manufacturers to convert their products from GSM-1800 into GSM-1900 (which is not trivial). The 1900 MHz would open the Brazilian market to the mainstream TDMA and CDMA products - while handicapping GSM.

So the argument in favor of 1900 MHz may *sound* like "freedom of choice"... but actually hides a nasty little anti-Nordic bias, which has blighted so many American telecom markets. We need to recognize this insidious form of prejudice in order to fight it. A choice favoring 1800 MHz would be the proper multi-cultural, market economy decision. CDMA and TDMA already have licenses in Brazil - it's time to open the market to mainstream GSM and let the people of Latin America join the global family of mobile telecommunications.

Tero

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext