<<aren't you the guy who gave money to some charity hosted by Anthony@Pacific?...giving your hard earned cash to someone convicted of mail fraud?...c'mon, let's think a little here>>
Swisstrader,
You sure are a stickler for doing background checks on anyone who posts something even remotely opposed to your pro-CNBC stance. Someone voices a concern over something they didn't agree with on CNBC and you counter with stuff like, "I saw you were at a pro-NRA event two months ago--you must be friends with Timothy McVey and David Koresh." Seems very Clinton-esque. Per chance, do you work for Larry Flynt or Rosie O'Donnell? Just a hunch. Defend your position by digging up dirt on your opposition...hmmm, who else has made that their (presidential) trademark over the past 7 1/2 years?
Also, since you are receiving PMs from "the CNBC crowd," (I'm assuming you are referring to CNBC employees), please ask them why GE was so sluggish Friday while the rest of the big financials were going through the roof. My best guess is that sheep--err, investors were so souped up by Breathless Maria's MU pep rally that they decided to dump their GE and use the proceeds to buy MU. Bwah-hahaha! That would be poetic justice at its finest.
Then again, I still believe that CNBC *wanted* to cover GE's sluggishness, but couldn't get a returned call from the co. You know what they say about publicly-traded companies who won't return CNBC's phone calls...
Gary |
