This is very scary! My Word!!!!!!!!
Your disdain for IDCC is becoming quite clear, Ruffian! Perhaps you should take to the Yahoo! message board threads to put down the stock?
Oh wait, you already have! Let's see...
Nok will spit out IDC like a used up whore, and there are no Johns left! Now are there? If so where does the line form?
messages.yahoo.com
i forgot, Daglish is
still passing out the
KOOL-AID.
What is the flavor this week?, GRAPE? LoL!
zit-boy= "the pimple on the back of the world".
messages.yahoo.com
Seriously, I don't need to copy all of your posts degrading IDCC and its shareholders (not to mention ERICY, NOK, et. al.) nor do I need to copy those where you hype QCOM rumors on other threads.
Your insecurity with QCOM is quite transparent as you travel the various telecom message boards of the world. And pasting 5 to 10 news items about QCOM on this and other boards isn't going to make you feel any more secure.
As for the safe harbor clause you commented on in your previous message...
Puh-leeze! Don't embarrass yourself like that. Perhaps you should be less concerned with the legal disclaimers IDCC publicizes and a little more concerned with the following:
Our future success will depend on our ability to continue to develop and introduce new products and product enhancements on a timely basis. As with our research and development efforts on HDR, there could be risks associated with obtaining manufacturers and operators for HDR. Our future success will also depend on our ability to keep pace with technological developments, satisfy varying customer requirements and achieve market acceptance...
If Our Industry Does Not Adopt CDMA Standards That are Compatible with Today's cdmaOne and its Supporting Network, Our Business May Suffer.
Industry and government participants of the ITU and regional standards development organizations ("SDOs") are currently considering a variety of standards which may be utilized in third generation wireless networks. We are advocating the standardization of CDMA-based third generation standards that accommodate equally the dominant network standards in use today -- GSM-MAP and ANSI-41. Earlier this year, the Operator's Harmonization Group ("OHG") agreed to such an arrangement, which would offer network operators three CDMA modes of operation -- CDMA Multi-Carrier, which includes both 1x Radio Transmission Technology ("RTT") and 3x RTT per the original cdma2000 submission to the ITU; CDMA Direct Spread, which is a converged version of the earlier W-CDMA proposal that has been modified since its adoption by ETSI; and Time Division Duplex mode for use in unpaired bands of spectrum. Significantly, the third generation standard will be interoperable with both GSM-MAP and ANSI-41, per the Company's position. The third generation standard have since been approved by the relevant ITU Study Group, and we anticipate that it will receive final approval by the ITU Radio Communications Assembly and adopted as a third generation standard by the regional SDOs....
...Despite our extensive patent position and the license agreements we have entered into with Ericsson and others which provide for royalties payable to us for certain products employing such CDMA standards, there can be no assurance that our CDMA patents will be determined to be applicable to any proposed standard. The adoption of next generation CDMA standards, if any, which are determined not to rely on our patents could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, liquidity and financial position.
10kwizard.com
Everyone on these message boards is investing for their future. Show these good people some respect. And show a little class, Ruffian.
postyle --out-- |
