SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : COM21 (CMTO)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (2160)6/5/2000 10:11:00 AM
From: Mark Laubach  Read Replies (2) of 2347
 
With regards to 64Kbps PCM encoding. It has several
benefits which include complete toll quality and
handling of all legacy modems and FAX, it is a constant
bit rate data stream which is real easy to schedule
in the upstream. You just know it is going to work.

I agree that there are codec's now that support varying
degress of compression so as to make more efficient use
of the upstream bandwidth. However, the more the signal
is compressed, the more bursty the packets become due to
the size and temporal varying of silence intervals. CBR
no longer is appropriate for scheduling. My own belief
is that there may have to be some over scheduling to
compensate for not incurring too many round trip times
for scheduling bursty arrivals, which would take back
some of the efficiency gains. I'm waiting to see what
happens as the industry gains experience. I could be
off on this, but I am suspicious, especially on moderately
loaded upstream channels.

For now, 64Kbps PCM works. Compression is definitely on
the way (in the industry). I just don't have numbers that
tell me what the real gains and quality tradeoffs are for
the various levels of compression.

Mark
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext