Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 35.53

-1.1%

Nov 14 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Ulrich Santo who wrote (103986)	6/5/2000 10:49:00 AM
From: Tony Viola	Read Replies (2) of 186894

Ulrich, >And even INTC proved, that there are problems! They made 2 mistakes using RMBS and therefore RMBS is not as easy to design as DRAM systems. This is a design problem. DRDRAM memory is a new technology. You could even call it revolutionary. Quite often revolutionary technologies have implementation problems when they first come out. Another recent revolutionary technology I can think of that has had early implementation problems is copper interconnect ICs. In fact, I'd be willing to bet that only IBM has it under control right now. Does that mean we should all give up on copper? Another, much more prevalent technology today, that took a long time to get going, is CMOS itself. It was introduced by RCA in the 1960's. But, it had skew, drive and other problems from the getgo that didn't really get solved for systems level usage, until 20 years or so later. We didn't give up on that, or we'd still be seeing TTL and ECL computers. Tony

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next