Ron,
Good News can change Non News into a Bad News.
The reverse I will avoid to give an example
as it may or not be true, just as a horse
has a tail, a tail has a horse we know is false
and I forget the math axiom or other that states
this, but Hutch for sure could tell us.
So Ron, its Dougie Utters More Babble (DUMB) Time.
Example: Ham.
============
No Ron, not you trying to be one,
but i guess i, but its not the example,
i, but that eating type from a pig.
Now i know what a ham tastes like,
and since most people did not have
them there pigies running around
where they lived like i did,
along with folks on the farm that
each year would cure and smoke and
prepare them for a later eating.
So i know how ham taste and i know
that the hams in food markets have
the label ham, but to me its like
a spongy red colored tastless rubber.
So this example is not for i but for
those who know only of a ham taste
from a can or plastic bag from food store.
They will say "I buy the expense good ham"
but i know that they are con'ed as what
they say is good is still bad, its just
not extremely bad. So let them taste
a ham made the old fashion way, the right way,
the way its done before corporate food stores
started selling tons of it. So once they taste
the way it really tastes, then poof the non news
becomes bad news as they can not go back to the
phony ham and accept it like before, like before
when it was not a problem, they accepted it "as is."
(on topic) Something like this will happen after folks
see how paper money retains it value once a gold type
backing is reintroducted, they will not want to go back
to the old ways.
Easy it is to read my post
and obtain as a multiple choice
not a question
but as a result,
as follows.
1. I never understood what he was saying.
2. I understood, but now do not.
3. I understand, but wish I did not.
4. I understand not to read his posts.
ok Ron lets start over,
and yes i realize that i may be here alone,
talking to myself as you did an eXit lines above.
But incase you is still here
hear me out
as the first line of this post
was as follows.
Good News can change Non News into a Bad News.
So Ron I will take your views
as correct and good and desirable.
Ron you state that putting importance
and significants and gold bug'ness
onto the physical gold stuff is not
only wrong but if accomplished would
lead to poor results.
ok, let it be so and lets identify
your worst case example, that being
the government of a nation doing that
which you say is dangeous folly.
Good versus Evil: Good = USA, Evil = China
The above in regards to personal freedom
in the area of free speech and thoughts.
Hong Kong--June 5--China is believed to have been
importing gold to increase the national gold reserves because of low prices in the international market...
"If the American people realized
that their entire gold supply
has gone to potential enemy hands
and that national security was at risk,
I am sure that politicians could not stand
the heat that they would receive
from their electorate..."
So Ron, if China's Central Bank
got and gets more of the physical gold
as a direct result of what GATA talks about,
that being the USA government's policy in
the Treasury/ESF and the debt effect thru GSEs
and activities of Bullion Banks, that you Ron
feel that China is "shooting themselves in the foot"?
So Ron you see the USA selling it's Fort Knox
physical gold to China's Central Bank as a good?
Is this "Good News" Ron?
Or is it a current "Non News"
to become "Bad News"?
Doug |
