Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 35.53

-1.1%

Nov 14 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: GVTucker who wrote (104065)	6/6/2000 11:05:00 AM
From: Tony Viola	Read Replies (1) of 186894

GV, >Second, I am starting to wonder what it would take for Intel to finally take Rambus out and shoot it. I'm just an indifferent and uninformed third party in this thing, but it seems to me that Rambus has caused Intel much more harm than good. Cool, succinct way to put it (not that it's Rambus' "fault" at all). After all, it is "only memory." Well, before I get jumped, with all the super fast L1, L2 (and L3 sometimes) cache that can be on die, or very close to on die, what IS the big deal about main memory any more? So you pay a 20, 30 or 40 cycle penalty once in a blue moon. Rambus must have the 8 1/2" by 11" glossies in a safe somewhere. Tony

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next