SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: edamo who wrote (26006)6/7/2000 7:45:00 PM
From: drew_m  Read Replies (1) of 54805
 
OT:

With apologies to the rest of the thread. I just can't sit here and swallow this.

My parents have made over a dozen mission trips deep inside Mainland China; they have a perspective that I doubt few Americans have of PRC.

edamo stated:

"theft of property"....can't steal that which is not offered or laid out to be taken.
------------------------------------------------------------

Of all of the statements I have read on SI this takes the cake.
One issue that helps me stay comfortable with QCOM and their dealings with PRC is that not only is IPR an issue with QCOM and PRC but the *ability* to execute on that IPR.
If QCOMS's IPR could be "stolen" It would not surprise me that the PRC would do just that.

edamo,

I hope I misunderstood you. For a second I thought you were using the Al Gore "No controlling legal authority" defense to the theft of IPR.

Sorry for the rant...
Drew
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News