SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 35.10+2.3%Nov 19 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (104229)6/8/2000 3:17:00 PM
From: pgerassi  Read Replies (1) of 186894
 
Dear Tench:

RDRAM is harder to route. It has a jitter allowance of 20ps to 40ps total between signals (PC800). This means that the traces be no more than +/- 0.6mm different in length and all have the same impedence (50 +/- 1 ohm)(even through the edge connectors). PC133 SDRAM has a jitter allowance of 500ps. This allows its trace length to be no more than +/- 7.5mm different, a much easier requirement. In a RIMM, there is more data traces than on a SDRAM. Remember that to get a 256MB RIMM requires 16 chips which, require 17 sets of channel traces. Where as SDRAM only needs one set. Thus there are far less traces in a SDRAM DIMM.

Which all leads to RDRAM being harder to route when used in a PC (or server) environment.

Pete
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext