rvgent, those old WLL projects never amounted to much. The question, to belabour the point for you, was why does India not seem to be involved with CDMA, meaning mobile networks, like most other countries are? cdg.org
Like New Zealand, it shows up as being in the CDMA gang, but in practise there is NONE in NZ until next year and India, as you found, is tenuous at best. Actually, it isn't really most countries, but it sure is most people.
I offered reasons why. All of them correct reasons. You seem to think that pointing out poverty, illiteracy, bureaucracy, socialism and stupidly voting to be poor, is racist. You ought to get a dictionary. I know it's supposed to instantly win an argument by using the word 'racist', but how about focusing on the question.
Why doesn't India have CDMA? That means mobile.
I know we are all supposed to be in love with wonderful democracy, but remember, Hitler was voted into power! People do vote themselves poor. They vote for apartheid [even in the USA there was segregation in living memory]. They vote to keep out evil foreigners with their disgusting capitalist tendencies [and CDMA technology].
So, you tell us, why no CDMA in India, where they could sure use the best technology?
My theory is that India is voting itself poor.
Mqurice
[CDMA in fibre doesn't count either]. |
