SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin
RMBS 87.20-3.3%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jim kelley who wrote (43879)6/10/2000 2:24:00 AM
From: Ali Chen  Read Replies (1) of 93625
 
<Also, it is clear that many of the criticisms of RDRAM RSL bus lodged by Carl apply also to DDR-II, i.e., Carl does not like the transmission line bus that RAMBUS uses. However, DDR-II will have the same problem of a very high clock rate together with a large number of data traces. DDR-II will require transmission line designed busses similar to RDRAM.>

The observation that any high-frequency connection
would require a proper design is a very smart
observation for a person like you. However, at least
two major things have escaped your attention.
The first fallacy is that you think that "busses" are
"similar to RDRAM". They are not. The DDR will not
hook up 32 spatially distributed pins to the same
bus wire as the ram-bs does. Driving a waveguide at
30+ points with inherently stochastic signals as
all PC data are was the stupidest idea I ever
heard of. Even in old time of thick Ethernet coax
cabling, real engineers knew that there are always
standing waves, so the cable was marked at proper
intervals where the hookup should be done. I seems
that Rambs engineers are somewhat ignorant in the
field, and the RIMM specifications are plain dumb
with this regard.

Second, you forgot that the DDR data frequency is
about 3 times lower than that on Rambs. Even assuming
the linear scale of difficulties in signal integrity
associated with ultra-high frequencies, it does
make some relief in manufacturing tolerances...

Sorry jim, you probably will never recover your
investments in Ram-bs. Face it.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext