SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Elmer who wrote (115377)6/11/2000 12:01:00 AM
From: pgerassi  Read Replies (1) of 1583681
 
Dear Elmer:

Tbird out runs Cmine using same NB except for FSB. Cmine is about 10 to 20% slower when comparing apples to apples, Via Apollo Pro vs KT133 using same SDRAM, etc. When running high computational loads, Cmine loses up to 50% slower. The peak yield of Cmine is still 650 to 700Mhz where K75 seems to be 800 to 850Mhz and Tbird is about 850 to 900Mhz (this is very early yet). With Cmine 4 speed grades behind, the average Cmine is blown out on any platform by the average Tbird on KT133. If Ali or 760 comes into play, Cmine will be relegated to the middle end, and possibly even soon to the low end. Even Intel is beginning to imply this. The average Williamette must exceed the average Mustang when it appears or Intel will lose the high end altogether.

For servers, clustering will probably take over the very large super servers. This is why DEC, now Compaq, still holds a large advantage to other servers. Their clustering technology is still recognized as the best currently available. In a cluster, the failure of one server, does not bring the whole system down with it. The others simply have a higher load and low priority apps just slow down. This is akin to what a Beowulf cluster does. Kind of a RAID for servers.

Pete
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext