SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : AUTOHOME, Inc
ATHM 22.04-4.0%Jan 30 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (23115)6/12/2000 12:01:00 AM
From: KailuaBoy  Read Replies (1) of 29970
 
Frank, OTOTOTOTOT

The introduction of the B8ZS line coding option (replacing AMI) happened around the same time,I believe, as ESF (extended super frame) replaced D4 as the default framing option. The line cards used by the phone companies were optionable at the T2 level which caused problems for years. What happened is that new customers were provisioned B8ZS/ESF and they would be put onto facilities that had D4/AMI optioned customers already running on them. The technicians had a couple of choices. Change the entire card to B8ZS/ESF thereby taking any D4/AMI customers out of service, leave the card alone and put the customer onto the card with the incorrect optioning which would shift the problem to the tech assigned to test and complete the circuit, and third they could send the circuit back for redesign. Option three rarely happened.

We should talk timing schemes and the differing stratum levels. That's cool stuff as well.

KB

ps. I didn't know about the problems arising from uneven electrical loads. Were the leveling "bogus bits" identified at the receiving end of the transmission via leveling algorhythms?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext