CYBR CyberCare the new look of healthcare Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : CYBR CyberCare the new look of healthcare

CYBR 456.95

0.0%

Jan 12 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Kevin Podsiadlik who wrote (2133)	6/12/2000 1:15:00 PM
From: sommovigo	Read Replies (1) of 3392

Kevin - I disagree, respectfully. Although information released as a PR may have the ability to move a stock, it is a purely emotional consideration when it concerns news that is not fundamental to the company. Again - my example of the shorts knowing well in advance of Herb's articles that they would be published. That the stock moved in relation to Herb's articles is more material than the announcement of a PR firm. But I don't see the short-sellers crying "foul" because they had foreknowledge of the articles... heck, some of them helped Herb to write the things. That the announcement of a PR firm was shared before the PR of the PR firm is, again, immaterial in the fundamental sense of the term. If you choose to trade against the news of a PR firm being hired, or if you choose to trade against a leak that Mike Morrell sneezed in his office... that is your choice, but it is hardly 'insider info' that can be traded against with certainty. You would have a defensible argument if CYBR "leaked" news of a contract before a PR of that deal was released, but this silliness about a PR firm - that dog don't hunt.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next