SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dan3 who wrote (115659)6/12/2000 9:34:00 PM
From: chic_hearne  Read Replies (1) of 1576898
 
Re: The impression I'm getting is that even Austin yields are better with Thunderbird

Dan,

I don't know any reason why you would say this.

For one, IBM has stated better yields on copper, so I tend to believe AMD also.

If you remember, it was 3 months ago that AMD called Intel's bluff and released 1 Ghz. These first wafers we are seeing from Dresden were started before the 1 Ghz release. I think it's safe to say that AMD wasn't ready to release 1 Ghz in March. All of us thought they were stockpiling parts and we would hit 10 sellers on pricewatch very quickly. All of us were wrong (Goutama's contest). I think AMD has exploited the potential of the Athlon faster than intended. Since wafer start to processor is a long 3 months, AMD has simply got ahead of itself. The processors coming out of Dresden were probably intended to debut at 1 Ghz being the fastest processor in the world while Austin and Intel would be on about 850 Mhz. Intel bluffed AMD and they had to react. Since it's 3 months to new product, it takes time to react. I have confidence that current wafer starts at Dresden are intended to bin higher than 1 Ghz. Time will tell us if AMD is able to increase speed grades over the next few months.

chic
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext