SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Joe NYC who wrote (115671)6/13/2000 12:41:00 AM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (1) of 1571904
 
Re: "What do you think the Coppermine-T could be? New revision? A die shrink? Some kind of optimization? It looks like this will be some major revision of the core to find itself on the roadmap, but not too radical to earn a code name? Is there any room to for the .18u equipment to get to .15u or lower?"

Jozef, Intel's .18u process started off with .13u channel lengths....

Re: "Suppose you do move the northbridge to the CPU. I guess there will be some savings in pins and some additional pins"

If they moved the RMBS controller on-die there would no longer be a FSB..not likely. SMP would be impossible with Intel's current architecture.

Re: "Suppose you do move the northbridge to the CPU. I guess there will be some savings in pins and some additional pins. You have add pins tor communication with AGP (piece of $hit), some communication with southbridge. I don't know what savings you could have. Can anyone come up with a ballpark figure of net addition of pins that migration of Northbridge to CPU would be?"

You'd drop 64 bits (or would that be 128 <G>) for the databus and 32 bits for the addresses and control signals that are multiplexed on those pins plus a few more signals but you'd add some for the AGP port and a hublink for the south bridge but why not just drop this because it ain't gonna happen...

EP
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext