Computer Associates Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Computer Associates

CA 25.02

0.0%

Jan 22 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: babette spatz who wrote (4530)	6/13/2000 3:24:00 AM
From: Crystal ball	Read Replies (1) of 5232

Monday down to $50 requires that CA BREAK THRU $60 by Friday. Otherwise Wang and co-defendants will have additional problems, beyond giving some of that money back. Personally the Delaware shareholder class action lawsuit from the that New York case mostly makes the lawyers rich, if they could not have had the authority to issue the stock, then that is the fault of CA's or Wang's own attorneys in not wording the options for the OBVIOUS case of stock splits (and thus double or half the issue authority---depending on your point of view). Of course if the stock is lower than the executed options, their real punishment should be to buy them anyway. They do not see it as punishment, that to me, means that this is legal insider trading, of the CONFIDENT BUYING KIND that bodes very well for CA. I am, Truly your$, -Crystal Ball

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next