SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly?
MSFT 472.22-1.3%Nov 21 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: david_si who wrote (46647)6/14/2000 2:33:00 PM
From: cheryl williamson  Read Replies (3) of 74651
 
david_si

These arguments are pure b.s.

First, M$FT has always had a monopoly in PC O/S's.
Once they signed on w/IBM back in the early 80's
everyone who licensed an INTC-based desktop platform
automatically licensed "PC-DOS", which belonged of
course to M$FT. It was an exclusive deal. Everyone
knows that. No one prevented AAPL from marketing
their O/S & hardware. Everyone knows that too. That's
not the point.

M$FT was smart enough to realize that their O/S &
appls were inextricably bound and that the success of
their company closely paralleled the success of marketing
BOTH O/S & appls together. One sells the other.

So, M$FT made sure no one else's appls worked on their
O/S as well as their appls did. Customers didn't go
to the store just begging to get MS-DOS. They wanted
the appls so they HAD to get MS-DOS. No one said, "You
are not allowed to publish an O/S for the PC becuase
M$FT is the BMOC and what they say goes."

Later on, M$FT's exclusionary tactics moved from
the engineering dept. to their legal dept.

Pricing has little to do with this case except that with
competition in the PC software market, M$FT's prices
would have decreased. The real consumer harm has come
in the form of product quality (lack of), and false or
misleading statements from M$FT about what their products
would do.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext