Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Elmer who wrote (116030)	6/15/2000 6:17:00 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (1) of 1578655

RE:"If Intel didn't intend CeleronIII to have a significant lifespan and intended instead to replace it with a newer version with perhaps some other integrated components" OOPPSS!! Ah ooooo Gaah! The horn sounds... SO maybe Intel wanted to replace the Cellymine with the Timna...but wait, the Timna is now delayed 6 months...into Q1, 2 0 0 1. It may be effectively DEAD. So now, Intel is forced to take Coppermines, disable half the cache and sell them for 1/3 the price for at least 6 months longer.... not good...and a new Cellie core just can't be popped right out the mold...eh? So how much did the delay of Timna really cost Intel? Hummm... I expect Celeymines may be in short supply...gotta hurt at Intel, sending a disabled coppermine at Celeron prices... OUCH! Enter D U R O N ....right chip at the right time...thank you RAMBUST! Jim

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next