SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : All Clowns Must Be Destroyed

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lucretius who wrote (40172)6/16/2000 9:50:00 AM
From: Crimson Ghost  Read Replies (2) of 42523
 
Something to think about before rushing to buy "bullish breakouts."

From the CONTRARY INVESTOR.

The Write Side Of The Trade...An interesting development is occurring. We sincerely thank our friends at Ned Davis research for explicitly
pointing it out. The development is the sentiment of the "smart money" versus that of the public and speculators at large. As you may know,
there are a good number of large commercial traders in the S&P 500 index futures market. For them, this isn't some game or dream of
retirement riches. It is a day to day livelihood. It's much more than serious business. These are pro's who are experienced, know the market
well, know what the money flows are and where they are coming from, and are anything but gamblers. These firms take very large positions in
both the S&P futures and cash markets. By many, these are considered "smart money". Based on history, for good reason. According to the
latest data put out by the CFTC, the commercials have a record net short position in the S&P futures. At the same time, what are considered
the public and the speculators have a record net long position. We're going to find out who's right and who's wrong before long. Significant
divergence in sentiment between the commercials and the speculators/public is not something that happens everyday. In fact, these
occurrences have happened in 1998, 1991, 1987 and 1986 prior to market weakness. Interesting, don't you agree?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext