SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Tidbits
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dr. Id who wrote (236)6/16/2000 9:54:00 AM
From: edamo  Read Replies (1) of 1115
 
doc....qcom "fud"?(as in "elmer")
today qcom appears firm on early strong volume...i nibbled a bit last week with 25 02200 short puts at 121...assigned cost of 79....this a.m. prior to open i was assigned on 9 contracts (900shares)...risk is clear...no different then long at 79, for a ltb+h position...

i find the psychology interesting, particularly in analyst comments....in january 250(1000) was touted....many sold the farm and invested in qcom....ironically the analyst prediction was at a topping point....now the reverse occurs, and the stock sells off...perhaps a bottoming indicator?

nothing has changed fundamentally....i was not a buyer at the higher levels, but below 80, it should be a good stock to inventory and sell against.....although near term it may have a perception problem
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News