SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : MSFT Internet Explorer vs. NSCP Navigator

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (24023)6/16/2000 10:37:00 AM
From: Gerald R. Lampton  Read Replies (1) of 24154
 
I must confess I am having a hard time understanding Microsoft's appeal strategy. If you read the Expediting Act, the statute is very clear that, once Jackson certifies it, the case goes to the U.S. Supreme Court -- automatically. Technically, the D.C. Circuit won't even have jurisdiction until the Supremes send it back to them, if they do send it back. So all of Microsoft's filings could end up being a whole lot of nothing.

Of course, Microsoft is arguing that the certification statute does not apply to the case brought by the states. Nice argument -- if you can win it. My guess is that it's kind of like the difference between statutory and constitutional diversity jurisdiction -- the former requires complete diversity, the latter does not.

In any event, the bottom line is that if the Supremes want the case, they'll interpret the Expediting Act so they get it. If not, they won't.

And, yes, it sure would be hilarious if the decisive factor in this antitrust case turned out to be the fact that Microsoft filed an overly-long brief. ;)
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext