Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 34.20

-2.6%

12:46 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Scumbria who wrote (104527)	6/18/2000 6:02:00 PM
From: Elmer	Read Replies (1) of 186894

Re: "I hear this claim all the time, but what parameters are out of spec? Ten made this statement, but did not have any details to back it up." Back it up??? Doesn't 133MHz vrs 100MHz speak for itself? That's 33% over frequency. Also the PLLs were intended to run at specific ratios and you would have to overclock the AGP port by 33% as well as the FSB and memory interface. Ditto for PCI. Everything must scale. Plus I know Intel doesn't test it at 133MHz FSB so they couldn't guarantee it either. Re: "My suspicious brain thinks that Intel would make a killer PC133 memory controller, if they didn't have the DRDRAM albatross around their neck." I think they just did. EP

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next