SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Paul Engel who wrote (116273)6/18/2000 6:26:00 PM
From: dougSF30  Read Replies (2) of 1586341
 
Paul, do you feel that the derogatory alteration of SI nicknames adds force to your arguments? Wouldn't the Yahoo boards better serve that style of post?

Back on the subject at hand, so if the initial Willamettes are targeted at 512 Mb - ish high-performance desktop/workstations:

1. What do you expect the performance advantage of that amount of RDRAM paired with Willamette to be over
(a) theoretical Willy SDRAM systems?
(b) theoretical Willy DDR systems?

2. Cost of that performance advantage in (1)?

As for AMD server chipsets-- I believe they're planning on DDR once they enter that space, although I understand they have a small RDRAM team (insurance?) around.

Doug
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News