SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly?
MSFT 476.080.0%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: JC Jaros who wrote (47009)6/19/2000 5:15:00 PM
From: rudedog  Read Replies (1) of 74651
 
JC - Jackson may well certify the case to the supreme court - but that has little to do with whether they take it. The supreme court wants cases where the essence has been boiled down to a single issue, and arguments can be heard in an hour. Thanks to NPR and Pacifica, I listened to actual testimony in about 20 supreme court cases, and they all honed in on a single question.

This case is nothing like that. What is the single question that the supreme court would consider? Jackson has left a mess, exacerbated by his failure to allow debate on the remedy phase. Issues of procedure and law are open, the remedies themselves are unprecedented and not well tied to either the charges or the evidence, and the implementation of the penalties is on a schedule which would not even allow the supreme court to schedule the hearings before implementation. Why would they touch that when the appellate court is ready to sort it out? No way (San) Jose!!
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext