SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 35.53-1.1%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (104653)6/20/2000 5:02:00 PM
From: Cirruslvr  Read Replies (2) of 186894
 
Tench - RE: "Cirrus, remember when AMD introduced the Athlon last year? It was billed at a 0.25u processor, yet it had both 0.25u and 0.18u features. I forgot what it was called, or how it works, but I'm guessing perhaps AMD has something similar planned for Mustang and Corvette. Maybe those processors will have both 0.18u and 0.13u features."

Yeah, it had the size of .25, but required voltage of .18. If AMD has the upcoming Mustang/Corvette the same way with .18 and .15/.13, respectively, then how are they reducing the size of the core? I guess I should ask the AMD thread.

You know, a .15 Thunderbird with 1MB L2 cache would be nearly the same size as the current Thunderbird (120mm2). If Mustang ends up coming out on .15, it will be a very low cost server/workstation processor. That may be how AMD intends to go up against the Cascades w/2MB L2 cache, the processor that is over 300mm2. Add LDT and one north bridge per two processors and I think you have a pretty powerful platform for multi-way systems. Got that Tony? ;)
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext