SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : ProNetLink...PNLK...Click here to enter
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: GENO who wrote (35710)6/20/2000 6:39:00 PM
From: ztect  Read Replies (1) of 40688
 
Boy you are silly........

When I felt the need to try to impress people with
my picks, I use to keep record of them.....

Message 7664852
Message 7704622

Now I don't care and feel no need. I post on one
stock thread's probably as much for the community
and entertainment value as for any financial commitment.
Tsig's thread has been a real freak show esp. on RB
with a former employee trying to get back at the CEO
via the internet and use of multiple aliases..........
If the stock dropped to zero, I'd still be fine.

But this thread gets to be plain silly.
Do y'all think I'm bother one iota if you call me "anything".
I just don't. Moreover, such slings and arrows
make it more amusing for me to stick around.

Rather than silly insults and talk of "agenda"
maybe you should stick to the topic at hand.

GZ by his own admission said PNL isn't in a "revenue phase"
Prior to this based on the membership model Glenn
was openly predicting "mass memberships" via contact with
CCO's thus "overnight" revenues.

Hence, he has scaled back his claims as the
realities of how and how not to make money on the
internet have come to pass.

I've never written PNL "won't" succeed. I wrote
that PNL needs a long run way. I'm concerned
about a non-revenue phase being too extended
espcially in light of the P2P article I posted
from Business Week. Thus the concern for
the PNL's ability to get financing on decent
terms from an IB or VC's, rather than what may appear
per message board gossip to be the selling
of preferred shares that upon hitting a strike
price could convert to a higher number of
common shares and thus create greater dilution.
I'm concerned that PNL has been unable to obtain
financing from a IB. Geeze even poorly performing
TSIG was able to obtain 125 mill in financing
in the same market climate.

There are other points regarding GZ's desire to
expand w. Global Marketing that would significantly
expand the burn rate, that could be argued both
for and against on issues concerning branding
and cost per set of obtained eyeballs, et cetera.

But rather than get in a for or against discussion
of point counterpoint, some of you krishnas,
act as if I stole your carnations and am beating
on your drums.

Like I said, you can say whatever you want about me,
it doesn't phase me, but IMO you'd
be better off discussing PNLK ....

Because y'all are just plain silly.

z
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News