SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : WDC/Sandisk Corporation
WDC 162.40+2.9%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TREND1 who wrote (12130)6/21/2000 3:36:00 AM
From: Tumbleweed  Read Replies (1) of 60323
 
Re Dan Gillmors article on the 1GB microdrive

As you said, we are all entitled to our opinions. Which is what his article is, rather than anything new or factual. Essentially (as he pretty much admits) he's awed because its reached a nice big round number. Had the 1GB drive been a 0.83 GB drive he probably wouldnt have written the article, but essentially nothing would have changed.

As he points out, put storage in things and there is more you can do with them. Yep. But that argument holds whatever the storage mechanism.

What he doesnt mention is reliability,power consumption and most importantly, absolute cost (not cost per MB). Without taking these into consideration, the drive will collide with reality and come off worse.

Joe
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext