SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The New Qualcomm - a S&P500 company
QCOM 169.97+1.1%1:12 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Eric L who wrote (12804)6/22/2000 12:08:00 AM
From: quidditch  Read Replies (1) of 13582
 
Eric, having said this (prior post), your observation bears some dissection. You wrote:

The Brazil 1800 MHz decision essentially dedicates the spectrum to GSM. Spectrum above 1800 MHz will be available for 3G along the European &
Japanese model for which DS was designed.

Brazil shares the 800 MHz AMPs heritage of the Americas. They deviate here from the Americas model of 800 MHZ and 1900 MHX and follow the
European model for 2G and 3G.


Why do you assume that "spectrum above 1800 MHz will follow the Japanese and European model, for 3G?

Yes, 2G at 1800 MHz is now decreed, amidst an existing CDMA and AMPS market. But can't this be looked at as Brazil hedging its bets in the carrier/market worldwide uncertainty as to "do I deploy MC or do I deploy DS?" By the time the 2G system is deployed at 1800MHz, events will have come to pass to give regulators and carriers more benchmarks by which to evaluate a choice of technology for 3G spectrum. China, Japan, Korea are all grappling with this. Brazil puts itself in this class of economic power. Doesn't this election by Anatel allow Brazil to play both sides?

Yes, there will be compatibility issues in 3G with the PCS at 1800MHz should Brazil elect to deploy 3xMC in the 3G spectrum, but by that time, I assume that roaming and multi-band ASICs will be pretty much de rigueur.

Steve
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext