The Critical Investing Workshop Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : The Critical Investing Workshop

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: im a survivor who wrote (23102)	6/22/2000 8:23:00 AM
From: Voltaire	Read Replies (1) of 35685

Hi Keith, I just posted about psychology and stocks and if we were to print a Primer on psychology and stocks, QCOM would be our subject. No way do I see anything but a SLOW ascent by the Q over the next few months. When you go up against a call from Greg it should give one pause but I have two bottles of Dom to prove he is not infallible, LOL. I still see the Q at 100 by the end of the year and mainly because I see the Naz between 5500 and 6000. That is why I hope everyone does not over stay their welcome with almost all stocks this time. Remember, I am into Houses and the question should be are the Houses into the Q. The answer is yes and they will take care of their inventory. Too much concentration is being placed on the fundamentals as Scott and John have mentioned when one part of my ESSENTIAL EQUATION is often overlooked, TIME. Everything is a Time Capsule to me and that eliminates a lot of Anxiety Neurosis. You must look toward the end of the year. My only question to you is - With the above in mind, why would I be in the stock and not in options with the meat of my money in something else I feel will move better while I wait out the move by Q? Volts

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next