Ultra Petroleum (UPL) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Ultra Petroleum (UPL)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Little Joe who wrote (4655)	6/24/2000 10:26:00 PM
From: Gerald Atwater	Read Replies (1) of 4851

Little Joe, <<ARE YOU SAYING THEY HAVE NO EXTRA WELLS?>> No. What I thought I said was that Ultra was "lucky" in that it got 22 NEW locations with the June, 2000, Decision Record because its sections were in that 50% (approximately) of the acreage that was downspaced to 40-acre wells. The remaining acreage either was kept at 80-acre spacing or "lost" locations. The net effect is same total number of wells on about half the original acreage from the l997 Jonah EIS. That's why another whole Environmental Impact Statement wasn't required. The l998 Record of Decision can be found here: wy.blm.gov

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next