Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO)

CSCO 75.19

-0.1%

Jan 16 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: The Phoenix who wrote (37931)	6/25/2000 2:40:00 PM
From: JDN	Read Replies (2) of 77400

Dear Gary: No, you have it backwards. The Purchase method DOES count intellectual property into the cost basis its the Pooling concept that doesnt. Anytime you set up an asset (in this case the intellectual property will either be assigned to patent portfolio value or left as Goodwill) it must be amortized over the expected life of the asset. In the case of patents its what 17 years or whatever they run. In the case of just Goodwill its NOW either the actual estimated life OR an arbitrary MAXIMUM presently 40 years, being asked to lower to 20 years. JDN

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next