Interdigital Communication(IDCC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Interdigital Communication(IDCC)

IDCC 342.70

-1.0%

9:35 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: w molloy who wrote (4355)	6/26/2000 4:02:00 PM
From: postyle	Read Replies (2) of 5195

w molloy, you said in your earlier post that the QCOM-IDCC settlement only applied to a restricted frequency. Do you have specific evidence of that... From sec.gov "...The license under InterDigital's Patents is limited to use in Wireless Applications which spread the CDMA signal over not more than a 10MHz bandwidth." the received opinion on all the other threads is that isn't the case Ahhh, but some have changed their minds when presented with the facts. Originally, Clark Hare, (someone with a well respected standing when it comes to patents on the Q threads) stated: "I have seen no evidence that the settlement was bandwidth specific, although I have seen some FUD about IPR being bandwidth specific. I'd be stunned if it were bandwidth specific. Read the ICD and Q! 10Ks to get a good idea of the settlement terms." Message 13381746 But when shown the Neopoint prospectus, he quickly changed his tune: "It appears to be true that Qualcomm did indeed license IDC's CDMA patents for only 10MHz or less" Message 13705304 How many times has this been brought up before? If I am misinterpreting your question, then forgive me this post. I am assuming when you are talking of "restricted frequency" that you mean bandwidth. Regards, postyle

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next