To: Ron Reece, From: Hutch, Tuesday, June 27, 2000
<<... I find you a refreshing personality on the GPM who
takes the time to study the material he comments on.>>
Not so Hutch, in my opinion ofcourse,
as to me you are a good example of one
that uses the tried and true scientific method
to collect data and make conclusions based
on observations to arrive at a conclusion that
has what we call an answer.
On the other hand, the process Ron Reece uses
is a mindless cut & paste of similiar views that
reside on a well defined agenda that was picked
by folks that want to be on the so called winning
side of an argument, and they seek out a topic
that is hard to prove and easy to bunk.
A post today by (i forget) replied to Ron (i think)
with a good one liner to identify that those like
Ron use words in a manner that has an implicit
truth contained in his facts, where in reality what
Ron uses to support his facts is itself a doubt.
"Depends what you mean by facts."
Bottom line here is that Ron uses stuff
that are not facts to prove his facts.
Very un-math wise to build stuff.
<<You don't brush off conversation, and make quick quippy remarks.>>
Ofcourse Ron does not do this quicky stuff,
as Ron will do a run'ish over of his aCup
of cuts & pastes and fill up the void of his
posts with extra voidness until the other
person trying to talk sense and open Ron's
eyes up gives up in frustration.
<<My only problem with you is that FAR to many times I'm in agreement.>>
I agree here, but in motive not objective.
<<... money supply is dictated primarily by the demand for US currency.
If you stifle supply by restricting money supply, it will increase the strength
of that currency beyond the level that is economically healthy. Best Regards Hutch>>
Now this is really a stinking pile of crap,
to identify demand as a single object
that has not any subjective attachments
to it, as if its a need like humans have
for air/oxygen to breath. B Looney.
Demand is like food, very subjective to the extreme.
Very much able to be manipulated for good and bad.
Demand like food can be wanted when not hungry.
Can be wanted even when intake is harmful.
Think of everywhich way food is presented to us
thru advertisments on tv commercials to get us
to buy buy buy, which translates to DEMAND.
Once again Hutch my observation of you is that
you are a good honest person that will work hard
and make good money and provide for your family
at an extremely excellent level. But once again
I say that you are working within a system that
is well within the laws of the land, but that these
laws have been created by corrupt people so that
they can suck out of others as much as possible
of what they produce and cannot retain because
the system is corrupt and steals it from them.
doug |
