Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: nosmo_king who wrote (26886)	6/27/2000 10:35:00 AM
From: DownSouth	Read Replies (1) of 54805

Even though digital cameras have been improving, the quality of the photographs is not as good as film based cameras (at least the sub $1000 models). The new 3 megapixel models for around $899 from Nikon and $799 from Canon make film quality 8x10 prints and very nice 10x14 prints. These models seem to have created the overlap between digital and film photography for advanced amateurs. If you are interested, here is a fantastic web site dedicated to digital cameras. imaging-resource.com I know a pro photographer and he is using digital equipment almost 100% of the time. His cost per shoot has gone way down and his customers expect to be able to select the best photos from the shoot then and there and walk out the door with them or have them in their e-mail by the time they get back to their office. With film, his clients are not able to review the shoot for days and then must wait additional days for the selected shots to be ready. In my opinion, digital photography is now a match for film photography in quality and far superior in cost, convenience, and capability.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next