SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Apollo who wrote (26873)6/27/2000 7:31:00 PM
From: rel4490  Read Replies (2) of 54805
 
< <<Does it make sense for a company like Rambus, which is pushing DRDRAM, to wait until the a minute before midnight, to roll out its patent claim on SDRAM and DDR? SDRAM has been around for years; why miss out on all those royalties for the past 5 or so years? >>>

Apollo, I can't add much more to Todd Bishop's response. My understanding is that the key patent covering SDRAM was applied for in 1990, but was not issued until 1999. RMBS attempted to negotiate with Hitachi in 1999, but was totally rebuffed. The Lawsuit was filed in January of 2000. A second lawsuit against Hitachi was filed in February, 2 days after additional patents were issued.

Rambus management clearly made no public waves with respect to SDRAM until January,2000. To what extent they exerted private claims, or whether in fact RMBS even believed it had IPR in SDRAM prior to the issuance of the patents, we will probably never know.

Rumors on the RMBS thread have Merrill Lynch doubting that all the DRAM manufacturers will settle without a fight.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext