SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The *NEW* Frank Coluccio Technology Forum

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jghutchison who wrote (293)6/28/2000 9:30:00 PM
From: ftth  Read Replies (2) of 46821
 
Hello Jack, those are all excellent questions. From what I've been able to find, any uniqueness amounts to proprietary twists that can be had in other ways by other players. I don't see any protectable technical advantage that makes them stand out ahead of the pack.

Essentially, the ONLY reason they are big news is the Gilder hype. No other reason whatsoever.

Lucent, however, provides them with the *possibility* of a key marketing advantage that the smaller players don't have the potential, experience, or budget for (at least not yet anyway). When there's no clear technical advantage (and if there were you'd think that one of the dozens of press releases or articles could have put that advantage into proper perspective), the marketing is what matters. (Arguably, marketing is what matters even if there is a technical advantage).

So their advantage--if any--may well be Lucent's size and reach more than anything. If they gain a bit of momentum the smaller players will have a tough time making inroads in the market ("...anyone knows an ant....can't...move a rubber tree plant"<gg>).

As for the real size of the market, all the projections are rosey generalizations (i.e. every business on earth that uses networks) and should be ignored until someone defines the proper subset that accounts for the limitations and for the fact that a good many already have service.

Not many businesses on earth will opt for blindly sending their life blood through arteries owned by a provider with unknown and unproven abilities to deliver reliable service. Forget about any technological claims--the *service* is what's important. Lucent gives them far greater *potential* to succeed as a business, but it's still all just words at this juncture.

Highly unlikely they could have gotten any real market-driven (customer market, not stock market) traction just from gilder hype.

Now there's always the "capture your customer's with stock options" route, which seems to be an acceptable practice these days. When we throw variables like that into the equation, anything can materialize, unfortunately.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext