Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 50.91

+0.7%

12:35 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: John Hull who wrote (21594)	5/13/1997 6:58:00 PM
From: jmac	of 186894

Dear Mr. Hull, As a shareholder of Intel who has a very large percentage of his family's portfolio in Intel stock, I would like to voice my opinion that Intel needs to be more agreeive in its responses to frivilous claims (the flaw and now DEC). Intel is going to be a target from now into the future. It's the biggest and the best and Intel needs to develop a strategy on how to handle frivolous claims which detrimentally effect shareholder and company value. I can't believe anyone at Intel believes that it infringed on DEC's patents. With respect to the "flaw" issue, it is now clear to me that there was a conspiracy by two individuals which was probably backed by one or more of Intel's competitors to tarnish Intel's Pentium II line. A flaw that existed for 18 months without a single user complaint? Intel did not go on the offensive in its response. Intel should have been more aggresive rather than simply turning the other cheek. Now DEC. I hope Intel turns up the heat a little. It isn't enough to be proven right in the long run. Shareholder value in the short and intermediate term should be Intel's concern also. "Vigorously defend?" Intel should go on the offensive. Just my opinion.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next