Free COII Lawsuits now Available for Filing in District Court:
Completed Professional Lawsuit worded according to UT Law against COII Now Available with your name insterted.
No need to hire an attorney. Sue the Bastards yourself.
For your personalized lawsuit e mail Smartypts@yahoo.com. Ready for Filing in District Court.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF UTAH
Jane Doe, CASE NO.
Plaintiff
COMPLAINT FOR THE VIOLATION
OF FEDERAL SECURITIES LAW
vs.
COII, David A Packer, David B Johnston.
Defendants.
____________________________________
Jane Doe, brings this action on behalf of him/herself and on personal knowledge as to him/herself and his/her activities, and on information and belief as to all other matters, based on investigation conducted by self, hereby allege as follows
1. This is a action on behalf of all Jane Doe a purchaser of the securities of COII (“Company”) , seeking remedies under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Defendants include: David A. Packer and David B. Johnston,
NATURE OF THE CASE
2. COII was conceived in Dave Packerts basement.. Its proclaimed business strategy was to scan for the detection of breast cancer. From its inception, COII represented that the cancer scanner was in the process of FDA approval through misleading press releases under the authorization of David Packert, President of COII., The continuous stream of positive representations by the Company and its officers caused the stock price to soar as high as $14.00
3. Throughout defendants assured the investing community that the scanning equipment was on schedule for FDA approval and that they were applying for FDA approval shortly when in fact the FDA approval was not even under consideration.
4. Notwithstanding their positive representations, defendants knew the following information which belied the efficacy of their representations:
1. The management of COII did not include a “full team of operational, finance, scientific, medical and technical personnel.” Rather it consisted of Dave Packert who has a history of Fraud and a $25 MILLION DOLLAR JUDGEMENT against said defendant and David Johnston.
2. “Doc” Yuri Parisky was retained for $1000 per day for professional consulting and diagnostic testing of the “cancer-scanner-wanna-be” yet Dave Packert failed to disclose this vital information to investors although the opportunity presented itself for truthful information.
3. Davis Johnson and David Packert and “Doc” Yuri gave false and misleading information in press releases. Only after being contacted by investors did he disclose David Packerts payments to him of $1000 per consultation. David Packert also mislead investors by failing to disclose the payment of $380,000 in grant money to “DOC” Yuri Parisky’s at his medical center.
Etc…. etc… To Large to Post Here. |
