Pangea Goldfields T.PGD Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Pangea Goldfields T.PGD

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: timbouctou who wrote (1128)	7/4/2000 3:49:42 PM
From: Enigma	Read Replies (2) of 1178

I don't suppose the officers and drectors have tendered because the offer is not in the mail yet. If a higher offer comes through then they will get the higher price. We all assume, probably correctly, that ABX will get this company. The only hope IMO is for a company who is a rival of Barricks to make a nuisance bid - to ensure that it costs Barrick more in the end. Someone told me that at PADAC the Barrick speaker almost boasted that production from Pangea properties would be going through the Buly mill eventually. A fait accompli in his mind even back then. I agree that another major might look at this thing - see the closeness of the parties and decide to up the ante - not by much - so the worst thing that can happen is that they win the property! But most likely Barrick will bid higher - so there may be some satisfaction in forcign a rival to spend another $50-$100 million form its treasury. The official reason for delays on drilling results from Tulawaka, Golden Ridge, and even Muhama is backlogs at the assay labs. So we have to take this at face value - although if Barrcik is holding back on drilling results at Golden Ridge it would be improper and not in accordance wilh full discloseure.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next