Who is this Gregory C. Johnson anyway Chirodoc? , a name you should know?
From (COII) COMPUTERIZED THERMAL IMAGING sec filing on 7/3/00
Financial Services Group, Inc (S)(W) 2,322,781 2,322,781
freeedgar.com.
From Dean Heller;
Dean Heller
Nevada Secretary of State
Corporate Information
Name: FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
Type: Limited Liability Company File Number: LLC17408-1993 State: NEVADA Incorporated On: December 29, 1993
Status: Dissolved Corp Type: Limited Liability Company
Resident Agent: DARREN J. WELSH (Accepted)
Address: 3790 S. PARADISE RD.
SUITE 200
LAS VEGAS NV 89109
Manager or Member: AMERICANA FINANCIAL GROUP
Address: 3790 S. PARADISE RD.
SUITE 200
LAS VEGAS NV 89109
Manager or Member: GREGORY C. JOHNSON
Address: 3790 S. PARADISE RD.
SUITE 200
LAS VEGAS NV 89109
Name: AMERICANA FINANCIAL GROUP, A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
Type: Limited Liability Company File Number: LLC16570-1993 State: NEVADA Incorporated On: December 16, 1993
Status: Revoked Corp Type: Limited Liability Company
Resident Agent: DARREN J. WELSH (Resigned)
Address: 3790 S. PARADISE RD.
SUITE 200
LAS VEGAS NV 89109
Manager or Member: GREGORY C. JOHNSON
Address: 3230 E. FLAMINGO RD.
SUITE 184
LAS VEGAS NV 89121
From (COII) COMPUTERIZED THERMAL IMAGING sec filing on 7/3/00
In connection with our private placement, we reached an understanding with Plaintiff and other individuals to assist in the placement of our common stock and warrants. The Plaintiff, in concert with two other individuals (the "Participants"), successfully raised approximately $10.7 million in the placement. By letter dated February 10, 2000, the Plaintiff informed us that Plaintiff and Participants had reached an agreement to equally share commissions attributable to the $10.7 million. Subsequently, we were notified that, during the time that Plaintiff was engaged to provide services to us, Plaintiff was an employee and/or agent of Financial Services Group, an investment company doing business in Kuwait. Notwithstanding, the Plaintiff claims entitlement to 100 percent of the commissions attributable to the $10.7 million. We are awaiting a resolution of the issues between Plaintiff and Financial Services Group.
tenkwizard.com.
From the Security and Exchange Commision.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Litigation Release No. 16147 / May 14, 1999
S.E.C. v. Anthony J. Marino et al., Civil Action No. 2:99CV
0258G (USDC UT).
On April 20, 1999, the Commission filed a complaint in
the U.S. District Court, District of Utah, against Anthony
J. Marino, Gregory C. Johnson, Richard Ames Higgins, Mousa
International, AJM Global, and Consortio Intranacional for
the fraudulent sale of at least $15 million in investment
contract securities to at least 80 investors from all areas
of the United States and several foreign countries. The
complaint alleges that beginning in 1997, Marino, Johnson,
and Higgins used Mousa International, AJM Global, and
Consortio Intranacional to raise over $15 million from the
sale of interests in “investment enhancement programs„ in
which investors’ funds were to be pooled and invested in
“prime bank instruments„ through a “prime bank„ or a “major
world bank in Europe.„ Investors were promised returns of
as high as 800 percent per year and were told that their
investments in these discounted bank instruments were risk-
free in that Lloyds of London would issue an insurance
policy on the programs.
The complaint alleges that the defendants violated
Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act of
1933, and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and seeks preliminary and
permanent injunctions, an asset freeze, civil penalties,
accountings, and disgorgement. A temporary restraining
order and asset freeze was entered on April 20, 1999, by the
Honorable J. Thomas Greene, United States District Judge.
On April 29, 1999, Judge Greene entered a preliminary
injunction and continued the asset freeze against all the
defendants but Higgins, for whom the TRO and asset freeze
was extended to May 10, 1999.
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND ASSET FREEZE ENTERED AGAINST ANTHONY
MARINO, GREGORY JOHNSON, RICHARD HIGGINS, MOUSA INTERNATIONAL, AJM GLOBAL
AND CONSORTIO INTRANACIONAL
On April 20, the Commission obtained an order freezing the assets
and temporarily restraining Anthony J. Marino, Gregory C. Johnson,
Richard Ames Higgins, Mousa International, AJM Global and Consortio
Intranacional from making fraudulent sales of unregistered interests
in "prime bank" trading programs. It was alleged that the
defendants made over $15 million in such sales by representing that
investors in the program were guaranteed returns of 20% per month;
the trading program had been approved by the Federal Reserve Board;
and investments in the program were insured against loss through a
policy issued by Lloyds of London. The Order was entered April 20
by the Honorable J. Thomas Greene, United States District Judge for
the District of Utah and included a clause requiring the defendants
to repatriate any assets which had been transferred out of the
United States.
The complaint alleged that since at least January of 1998, the
defendants had engaged in fraudulent sales of interests in a "prime
bank" scheme in which they guaranteed a high return to be generated
by repeated purchases and sales of financial instruments issued by
the world's "prime banks." Among other misrepresentations, the
defendants asserted the investors' principal was insured against
loss through Lloyds of London and that the Federal Reserve Bank had
approved the investment scheme. Further, the Commission alleges
that Anthony J. Marino did not disclose to investors that he had
been convicted of securities fraud by the State of Nevada and
ordered to cease and desist from fraudulently soliciting investments
in securities by the State of New Mexico. The Commission alleged
that through their false and misleading statements, the defendants
violated the antifraud provisions, Section 17(a) of the Securities
Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The Commission also alleged that the
securities sold by the Defendants were investment contracts which
should have been registered pursuant to Sections 5(a) and (c) of the
Securities Act of 1933. [SEC v. Anthony J. Marino et al., Docket
No. 99-CV-0259G, USDC Utah] (LR-16118)
jefren.com |
