Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 179.02

+3.7%

Nov 5 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Rajala who wrote (75733)	7/7/2000 5:23:17 PM
From: marginmike	Read Replies (2) of 152472

Rajala is that why ERICY pays equall royalties on either technology? That is in a written contract, everything else is just speculation. Why would Ericy agree to such terms if they invented CDMA? COme on RAJ your full of it, and have now been wrong for two years. Hows that WLL that LWIN is spinning out? Your a joke and anyone who responds to your, obviously eurotrash views is a bigger joke. Look folks, go back to SI postin in Jan 99 and read them. WCDMA was a theory a year ago. It is baisicly CDMA with a diferent chip rate and base syncrinization diferences. When we first analysed the WCDMA propasal to ETSI every engineer here laughed at the proposal. A)It didnt work B)its changes ditracted from the system. WCDMA is still a bargaining chip. When all said and done, you can call it what you want but WCDMA will be CDMA2000 with cosmetic differences to make it non backward compatible to IS95. The oldtimers understand this, and therfore have no question WHATSOEVER that Q gets paid. Besides ERICY SIGNED A CONTRACT THAT STATES THAT THEY PAY EQUAL ROYALTY NO MATTER WHAT TYPE OF CDMA THEY USE. THIS IS A FACT NOT AN OPINION

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next