SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : WDC/Sandisk Corporation
WDC 163.00-0.4%Nov 7 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ausdauer who wrote (12686)7/8/2000 10:23:06 PM
From: wily  Read Replies (3) of 60323
 
Ausdauer,

Regarding the article on SST's ATA embedded chip.
ebnonline.com

This does not make sense to me. They are saying that the memory and controller are on the same chip, and that the largest is 64Mbytes. That would mean that there is 512Mbits of memory on that chip which is denser than anything now being produced in the Flash industry (Hitachi's 256Mbit chip is the biggest I've heard of so far.) And this from a company that has up to now concentrated on the lower end of the density spectrum. And they've got logic on the chip too...

My guess is that this is a module or a multichip package of some sort. Their Flash cards (CF, for instance) are already ATA-based, and available in the same capacity range, so this is not a big jump for them -- just a move to another form factor.

I'm intrigued by SST's claims of manufacturing efficiency (14 mask steps vs 20 for other Flash designs), robustness and scalability. I've heard in a few places that Flash faces a fundamental challenge in scaling to smaller design rules. I hear a possible echo of this in Harari's warning that execution is the biggest risk for his company. Maybe it will be a tough ramp at .13mu? Maybe SST either thinks they will have an easier time scaling to smaller design rules (and larger densities)? I wonder if their technology is adaptable to multibit/cell?

wily
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext