Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 137.67

-7.5%

10:53 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Art Bechhoefer who wrote (580)	7/10/2000 1:09:32 PM
From: q_long	Read Replies (1) of 197582

The whole issue of interoprability , backward and forward compatibility are what makes me think Korea would still be committed to CDMA 2000. It makes no sense whatsoever to go WCDMA. Aside from technical attributes compatibility is the most compelling reason to consider CDMA2000. Why would Korea back CDMA 2000 now? With new spectrum, they have everything to gain by posturing with WCDMA short term. (negotiations, playing both sides of the fence). It looks like no final decision will be made until September. A change back to CDMA 2000 could have a domino effect in Asia. Our next hurdle will be working through the inevitable bugs and glitches of 2.5G. You know the GSM camp will play this up Anyone think DDI or Unicom might reneg on CDMA2000 and posture with WCDMA? IMO

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next